Retrospective Review of Pyrocarbon Hemiarthroplasty for Carpometacarpal Arthritis: An Examination of Long-Term Outcomes and Complications

Abstract

Background

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis is a common and sometimes debilitating condition with a variety of surgical treatments. Pyrocarbon thumb CMC hemiarthroplasty is one option, which has demonstrated promise; however, no long-term outcomes have been reported.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective institutional review of 106 primary thumb CMC pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasties with a minimum of 1 year, median 6.1-year follow-up. We analyzed rates of pain relief, reoperation, and implant failure as well as biomechanical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Pain was significantly decreased after surgery. Radial and palmar abduction were modestly improved postoperatively (increased from 40–50 degrees). Implants showed high rates of radiographic osteolysis (53%) and subsidence (44%). Two-, 5-, and 10-year rates of reoperation (18, 21, 21%) and implant removal (15, 19, and 19%), respectively.

Conclusions

Pyrocarbon thumb CMC hemiarthroplasty provides high rates of pain relief and preservation of pinch and grip strength. Patients had modest improvement in radial and palmar abduction; however, hemiarthroplasty was associated with moderate rates of reoperation and implant revision.

Level of Evidence

Therapy Level IV.

Keywords

carpometacarpal arthritis - pyrocarbon - arthroplasty - patient-reported outcomes

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Publication History

Received: 07 June 2025

Accepted: 01 September 2025

Article published online:
29 September 2025

• References

• 1 O'Shaughnessy MA, Rizzo M. Nonoperative management of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Hand Clin 2022; 38 (02) 161-168
• 2 Ganhewa AD, Wu R, Chae MP. et al. Failure rates of base of thumb arthritis surgery: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (09) 728-741.e10
• 3 Athlani L, De Almeida YK, Martins A, Seaourt AC, Dap F. Thumb basal joint arthritis in 2023. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2024; 110 (1S): 103772
• 4 Saab M, Chick G. Trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2 (03) 141-149
• 5 Yang SS, Weiland AJ. First metacarpal subsidence during pinch after ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition basal joint arthroplasty of the thumb. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (05) 879-883
• 6 Rhee PC, Paul A, Carlsen B, Shin AY. Outcomes of surgical management for thumb basilar arthritis in patients 55 years of age and younger. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (05) 641-645
• 7 Vitale MA, Taylor F, Ross M, Moran SL. Trapezium prosthetic arthroplasty (silicone, artelon, metal, and pyrocarbon). Hand Clin 2013; 29 (01) 37-55
• 8 Jörheim M, Isaxon I, Flondell M, Kalén P, Atroshi I. Short-term outcomes of trapeziometacarpal artelon implant compared with tendon suspension interposition arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a matched cohort study. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (08) 1381-1387
• 9 Nilsson A, Wiig M, Alnehill H. et al. The Artelon CMC spacer compared with tendon interposition arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (02) 237-244
• 10 Martinez de Aragon JS, Moran SL, Rizzo M, Reggin KB, Beckenbaugh RD. Early outcomes of pyrolytic carbon hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of trapezial-metacarpal arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (02) 205-212
• 11 Vitale MA, Hsu CC, Rizzo M, Moran SL. Pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty versus suspensionplasty for trapezial-metacarpal arthritis. J Wrist Surg 2017; 6 (02) 134-143
• 12 Aita MA, Alves RS, Longuino LF, Ferreira CH, Ikeuti DH, Rodrigues LM. Measurement of quality of life among patient undergoing arthroplasty of the thumb to treat CMC arthritis. Rev Bras Ortop 2016; 51 (04) 431-436
• 13 Kennedy CD, Manske MC, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: the Eaton-Littler classification of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (12) 2729-2733
• 14 Zelenski NA, Rizzo M, Moran SL. Outcomes of secondary trapeziectomy following carpometacarpal pyrocarbon prosthetic arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (05) 429-436
• 15 Krukhaug Y, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Hove LM, Hallan G. The results of 479 thumb carpometacarpal joint replacements reported in the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (08) 819-825
• 16 Salem H, Davis TR. Six year outcome excision of the trapezium for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: is it improved by ligament reconstruction and temporary Kirschner wire insertion?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (03) 211-219
• 17 Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis TR. Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (03) 411-417
• 18 Moineau G, Richou J, Liot M, Le Nen D. Prognostic factors for the recovery of hand function following trapeziectomy with ligamentoplasty stabilisation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95 (05) 352-358
• 19 Sai S, Fujii K, Chino H, Inoue J. Tendon suspension sling arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint: long-term follow-up. J Orthop Sci 2004; 9 (06) 576-580
• 20 Janakiramanan N, Miles O, Collon S, Crammond B, McCombe D, Tham SK. functional recovery following trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a prospective longitudinal study. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (11) 963-971